Sondage Léger : Meilleur premier ministre - Québec.

PSPP :    23 %

CM :       17%

CF :        16%

ED :        11%

RG :        4%

Ne sait pas :    30%        

POILIÈVRE OUT!: We've Made A Beachhead!

Angus Reid made my day: we are now at thirty percent of past CPC voters who want Pierre out. When it comes to the general public, sixty percent view him unfavourably while forty-five percent blame him for pushing people away [out] of his party. And those are the people who vote. Man, this is great. 

Time is Pierre's most powerful enemy. It will continue to move the numbers against his leadership. We will get him out. It's only a matter of a few months. Each floor-crosser was a vote of non-confidence in the leader. Let's wait and see if there will be any more.

58% of past CPC voters stand by Poilievre’s long-term leadership, but increasing numbers say he should go - Angus Reid Institute

POILIÈVRE OUT!: Now You Know Why Only A Handful Of CPC MPs Defended Pierre.

Most of the caucus is angry and frustrated. What party in its right mind would keep a leader who couldn't even win his own seat, a seat he held for TWENTY years? The writing is already on the wall. This will play out over the next three to four months, and in the end, Pierre will be gone. It will most resemble the playbook used against Trudeau: one MP, then a trickle, followed by a half-dozen and finally one-third to one-half of caucus. Once we hit that mark, no one will be able to save Pierre's leadership. He'll be done as dinner. Hopefully, by then, he'll have put his ego in check and have the decency and humility to just go. But I won't be holding my breath waiting for him to leave. So, keep pushing and with each passing week, push harder!

POILIÈVRE OUT!: Nanos Breaks Down The Real Issue Pertaining To Pierre's Leadership.

© Nanos Research.

Preferred PM

52%▼2Carney25%▲2Poilievre14%Don't know4%▲1Lewis3%Blanchet2%May

Nanos Research federal poll | 2026-04-10

PLQ : Sondage Pallas.

Ah, on voit ici se dessiner le début d'une tendance où le PLQ est en tête, mais cette fois avec trois points d’avance sur le PQ. Ce dernier n’obtient que 29 % des intentions de vote. Le PCQ et la CAQ sont au coude à coude à 14 %, tandis que QS est à la traîne avec 11 %.

Avant tout, il est dans la nature même des libéraux de prendre le pouvoir, quel qu’en soit le coût ou l’impact préalable sur leur coalition. Traduction : ce n’est qu’une question de temps avant que Milliard ne se retourne contre les communautés anglophones et culturelles. Peu importe si les anglos sont déjà en révolte au sein du parti, la réplique dans la langue de Shakespeare sera « so what ». 

S'il doit se contorsionner comme un bretzel pour remporter les prochaines élections, je peux vous assurer que Milliard n'y verra que du positif. Après tout, les membres minoritaires de la coalition du PLQ sont déjà pris pour acquis et, en substance, tenus en otage. Ils n'ont nulle part où aller. En bref, ils feront partie de ceux qui subiront des dommages collatéraux à la suite de la prochaine campagne électorale.

POILIÈVRE OUT!: CPC Supporters Will Start Lying To Pollsters.

Act 3

This will be the first pressure tactic used by dissident Conservatives to put pressure on Pierre to go: they will begin deliberately lying to pollsters, telling them that they intend to vote Liberal in the next election to further inflate Liberal gains in the polls. Once CPC numbers reach a negative tipping point, dissidents will have all the ammunition they need to demand that the Reform Act be dusted off.

 

POILIÈVRE OUT!: Pierre Blows The "Very Badly Educated" in Economics Schtick.

Act 2

I can picture Katy rolling her eyes: he just doesn't get it. Pierre should know by now that people are always on the lookout for a reason to dismiss both the leader and his argument, and he played right into that Liberal narrative. First off, in Comm 101, you acknowledge the Prime Minister's degrees from Harvard and Oxford. Then you explain how he's a Keynesian, and only then do you put your main arguments forward while emphasizing at the same time what Austrian economic theory professes and why it is correct in its analysis of the digitization of money and the relationship to increased inflation via what is commonly but erroneously termed "money printing." Finally, you make the case that there's a direct causal relationship between Keynesianism and beyond core inflation historical statistics. 

I imagine there's no hope that Pierrre will ever get this right...