I see some merit in both arguments, but to settle it, I want to apply the Ahenakew Test: his remarks were judged by the OC Advisory Council as having brought disrepute to the Order of Canada, and GG Clarkson stripped him of his membership.
In both cases, I do not wish to cite the controversial remarks, but Cherry's constitute a pattern. In this case, the AC would have to examine the comments in question and then recommend to the GG whether the award should go ahead.
I have read the texts of the offensive remarks, and they fail to meet the standard for the award. I have not seen any clarification or contrition coming from Cherry, which is surprising.
So, in the end, I stand with most of the Quebec Conservative MPs. This should be a teaching moment for the party because, quite obviously, English-speaking CPC MPs don't get it, not one bit. That leaves the leader in a tough spot, having apparently already signed the petition. Ouch. We do indeed still live in a world of three solitudes. What a terrible shame for the country.
No comments:
Post a Comment